I feel that often the two topics are mixed up. This is understandable as both Jeet Kune Do and the idea of personal development/evolution come from the same source, Bruce Lee! So what are my views?
Jeet Kune Do is the martial art that Bruce Lee developed, it was his personal 'end result, or end product' of his years of studies on the martial arts. It is well known that he said that he was developing a system chiefly made up of Ving Tsun, Fencing and boxing, but soon realised that things needed adapting to fit together. This resulted in studies on how the human body moves, and how this fits in a martial arts structure. He used those latter studies to eventually arrive at what his Jeet Kune Do looked like/contained in the year(s) leading up to his untimely death. Yes the dominant influences are Ving Tsun, Fencing and Boxing, they do form the foundation, but by integrating the knowledge of human body mechanics, the elements of these arts were modified where required to fit that exact structure, but that's a topic for a future post. It is true that he studied other arts too, but not as some people say , to integrate them into Jeet Kune Do, but rather to study them to develop ways to defeat such martial artists.
Towards the end of his life, Jeet Kune Do was already far developed, it contained elements of all forms of unarmed combat, including striking (punching and kicking), trapping, and to a lesser degree also some groundwork (throws etc) Again not specifically various arts, but the principles of efficient human movement to execute those tasks. If you have trained in the art for a few years, and you have understood Bruce Lee's notes/comments etc. you will start to realise that actually Jeet Kune Do isn't really missing much, if anything. (also study the Tao of Jeet Kune Do 'facts of Jeet Kune Do' on page 23. )
It is a well rounded system that has everything you'll need for self defence. People that say it is 'missing' something are probably focussed on just a part of the art. This is perhaps because that idea is enforced due to the fact that most JKD practitioners appear to train on the stand up elements of fighting, seemingly neglecting the 'ground work/wrestling' parts. (it's often the stand up element you see in promotions etc.).
It must be said however that Bruce Lee's view on the groundwork was that there were easier / simpler ways to inflict pain on an opponent, so he primarily studied these principles from a point of defending against it. Despite his fighting abilities, he was also aware that he was a smaller individual and if he ended up wrestling with someone bigger and heavier than him, he'd potentially be at a disadvantage. Lastly, and a very important issue is that Bruce Lee stressed 'less is more' (hack away the unessentials). Not only from the point of limiting your arsenal and get really proficient in a couple of things, but also stripping away all unnecessary additional movement, no 'get set, ready' preparations etc, no telegraphing of intentions, honing the fine motor skills, and drill to ensure the techniques become ingrained such that in a moment of high stress/fear, they are there like a reflex! (I do not hit, it hits all by itself)
I am all in favour of people training / furthering their knowledge on certain aspects of (unarmed) fighting/combat. Perhaps it fits your fighting style, perhaps its because the person intends to compete in tournaments where that aspect is prevalent, so you start to 'specialise'.
So what's the problem? My issue is with the identity of Jeet Kune Do, Bruce Lee's body of work. I want to preserve that body of work for future generations.
If people proceed to 'do their own thing', then there is a real risk that at some point personal preferences will dominate and perhaps deviate from some of the basic principles that Bruce Lee incorporated in his JKD and that formulates its identity. A simple example is the strong side forward. If that is no longer the case in someone's preference, then that is deviating from Bruce Lee's JKD and will over time (students of that person and beyond) lose any semblance with what the orginal art once was. Now I know that I mentioned the study of 'fixed' patterns in my blog on the 'Ung Moon' form in May 2026. This 'learning fixed patterns' is a different topic than not 'expanding/evolving' the JKD curriculum. JKD definitely is an art that allows freedom, as in we don't solve problems in fixed sequences, fights are dynamic/spontaenous in nature, and so should be our training, but JKD has core strategies and structure.
I'm not saying that what ever the result is, is inferior. It may in fact be very well suited to the individual. So if that is what your goal is as a martial artist, to find what works for you by studying all sorts of styles etc and to take what works for you and develop your own style/system, then great. You are doing what Bruce Lee at times spoke of. You are not neccesarily arriving at the same point that Bruce Lee did, and what he called his Jeet Kune Do.
So in closing:
- Jeet Kune Do is Bruce Lee's personal 'art', that deserves to be preserved 'as is' and you will find that it is a great art in it's own right that will serve you well. Changing/adding things will muddy the water and JKD will eventually cease to exist, which would be a crying shame.
- If you are looking for 'more', or want to follow your own path, then that 'exploring' is what Bruce Lee did himself, but will not neccessarely lead to the same end product, and therefore should not be called Jeet Kune Do, even if you studied JKD first and then start to move away from it for whatever reason.
Feel free to disagree, we are all individual, and as a JKD practitioner I hope you are a critical thinker, not just a blind 'follower' of the 'truth', but if you do have a different view, I'd be interested in hearing from you. Comment below.
Walk On!


